Vol. 40 | No. 1 | January-June 2012 Back

Open Access

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation with Corevalve®: A New Mode of Therapy for Surgically High-Risk Patients with Severe or Critical Aortic Stenosis

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Aortic Stenosis (AS) is a common and life-threatening disease that presents with angina, heart failure, or syncope. Internationally, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become accepted as a less invasive percutaneous alternative to surgical replacement for high-risk patients with severe or critical AS. 

OBJECTIVE: This paper presents the first TAVI case performed at The Heart Institute of the Chinese General Hospital and Medical Center, and reports the first valve-in-valve TAVI case in the Philippines. 

CASE: An 87-year old diabetic male patient presented with congestive heart failure and a history of coronary artery bypass grafting, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic renal insufficiency. A 2-D echocardiogram (2DE) revealed severe AS with normal left ventricular function. Left heart catheterization confirmed severe AS and showed severe triple vessel coronary artery disease with continued patency of all bypass grafts. Surgical aortic valve replacement was recommended but deemed too high-risk. Ancillary studies revealed that the patient was a viable candidate for TAVI. A 29-mm Corevalve® was implanted, with subsequent moderate to severe paravalvular aortic regurgitation (AR). A second 29-mm Corevalve® was implanted within the first Corevalve®. The patient tolerated the procedure well with marked improvement in symptoms. A repeat 2DE showed normal functioning bioprosthetic valve with minimal AR. 

CONCLUSION: TAVI is an alternative mode of therapy in carefully selected surgically high-risk patients with severe or critical AS. Careful and thorough pre-procedural measurements are key for proper valve sizing. Post TAVI calculation of the aortic regurgitation index is important in determining the short- and long term success of the procedure.

  1. Ross J, Jr. Braunwald E, Aortic Stenosis, Circulation 1968;38:61-7.
  2. Nikomo VT, et. al. Increasing Valvular Disease In the Elderly. Lancet 2006;368:1005-11. 
  3. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, ChatterjeeK, et.al. 2008 Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation 2008;118(15):e523-e661. 
  4. Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Bash A, et al. Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: first human case description. Circulation 2002;106:3006-8. 
  5. Leon, MB, Smith CR, Mack M, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Eng J Med 2010;363:1597-607. 
  6. Kodali, SK, Williams MR, Smith CR, et al. Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement. N Eng J Med 2012;10.1056/MEJRoa1200384. Published online on March 26, 2012. 
  7. Jilaihawi H, Kashif M, Fontana G, et al. Cross-sectional computed tomographic assessment improves accuracy of aortic annular sizing for transcatheter aortic valve replacement and reduces the incidence of paravalvular aortic regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1275-86. 
  8. Sherif MA, Abdel-Wahab M, Stöcker B, et al. Anatomic and procedural predictors of paravalvular aortic regurgitation after implantation of the Medtronic Corevalve® bioprosthesis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56;1623-29. 
  9. Sinning JM, Hammerstingl C, Vasa-Nicotera M, et al. Aortic regurgitation index defines severity of peri-prosthetic regurgitation and predicts outcome in patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59;1134-41. 
  10. ADVANCE Study: Corevalve® system trial results reinforce positive clinical outcomes. Presented in Chicago at the American College of Cardiology meeting, 2012.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, which permits use, share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material, as long as you give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.