
In-Hospital Outcomes of Patients with Thoracic and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Who Underwent Surgical, Endovascular and Conservative Medical Management
Abstract
Background: Aortic aneurysm is a life-threatening condition related to its catastrophic complications of rupture and dissection that warrants consideration of early surgical repair. The decision to intervene for aortic disease remains a challenging decision because of the concomitant high-risk factors and comorbid illnesses as well as increased morbidity and mortality related to it.
Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study that included 275 patients with thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms with indication/s for intervention seen at January 2012 to December 2015. The population was divided into three groups, namely, surgical, endovascular or hybrid and medical management groups, respectively. Outcome measured included in-hospital mortality, cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, pulmonary and renal complications, embolic events and infection.
Results: Seventy-six percent of the patients underwent surgical repair, 16% underwent endovascular or hybrid strategy and 8% received conservative medical management. The overall mortality rate was 16.36%, with a significant higher in-hospital mortality in the medical group (p=0.001). Infection rate was highest in the surgical group (54.07%, p=0.001). The rates of cardiovascular events (p=0.069), neurologic complications (p=0.094), renal failure (p=0.082), respiratory failure (p=0.908), and embolic events (p=0.381) were similar between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis for in-hospital mortality showed that strategies of endovascular repair were not associated with significant survival benefit (adjusted OR 0.987; 95% CI 0.22 – 4.44; p=0.986).
Conclusion: Prompt evaluation for early aortic aneurysm intervention either by open surgery or endovascular procedure is needed because of high mortality related to medical management of large aortic aneurysms. A strategy of endovascular and/or hybrid repair was not associated with significant reduction in in-hospital mortality when compared to open surgery, but evaluation of intermediate and long-term outcomes is warranted. The use of endovascular or hybrid technique can be considered a feasible alternative to surgical repair especially in high-risk patients.
Keywords: open surgical repair, endovascular, medical management, thoracic aortic aneurysm, abdominal aortic aneurysm, 30-day mortality.
- Isselbacher EM. Thoracic and abdominal aneurysms. Circulation 2005; 111:816.
- Clause WD, Hallett J, Schaff H, Gayari M, et al. Improved prognosis of thoracic aortic aneurysm – a population-based study. JAMA. 1998;280(22):1926-1929.
- Crawford ES, De Natale RW. Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm: observations regarding the natural course of the disease. J Vasc Surg 1986; 3:578.
- Giepp RB, Ergin MA, Lansman SL, et al. The natural history of thoracic aneurysms. Semin Thiracic Cradiovasc Surg 1991; 3:258.
- U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142:198.
- Chaikof EL, Brewster DC, Dalman RL, et al. The care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: the Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines. J Vasc Surg 2009; 50:S2.
- Davies RR, Goldstein LJ, Coady MA, et al. Yearly rupture or dissection rates for thoracic aortic aneurysms: simple prediction based on size. Ann Thoracic Surg 2002; 73:17.
- Coady MA, Rizzo JA, Hammond GL, et al. Surgical intervention criteria for thoracic aortic aneurysm: a study of growth rates and complication. Ann Thoracic Surg 1999; 67:1922.
- Lucas P, Tuano N. Cardiovascular profile and risk factors of Filipino patients with infrarenal abdominal aneurysm at the Philippine Heart Center from January 2005 to March 2012. (unpublished).
- Butoctoy B, Junia A, Abola MT, Garcia F. In-hospital outcome of patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm admitted at PHC from 1994 to 2003. (unpublished).
- Lee HC, Joo HC, Lee SH, Lee S, Chnag BC, Yoo, S, et al. Endovascular repair veruss open repair for isolated descending thoracic aortic aneurysm. Yonsei Med J 2015; 5(4):904-912.
- Jonker F, Verhagen H, Lin P, Heijmen R, Timarch S, et al. Open surgery versus endovascular repair for ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2011 May; 53(5):1216.
- Dangas, G, O’Connor D, Firwana B, Brar S, Ellogy S, Vonyunka A, et al. Open versus endovascular stent graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm – a metaanalysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2012; 5(10):1071-1080.
- Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Powell JT, Thompson SG, Epstein D, Sculpher MJ. Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Eng J Med 2010; 362:1863-1871.
- Biancari F, Catania A, D’Andrea V. Elective endovascular versus open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm in patient aged 80 years and older: systematic review and metaanalysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011; 42(5):571-576.
- Edwards ST, Schemerhouse ML, O’MAllery AJ, Beasley RP, Hurks R, et al. Comparative effectiveness of endovascular versus open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in the Medicare population. J Vasc Surg 2014; 59(3):575-82.
- Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, Bossone E, Di Bartolomeo R, et al. 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases. Eur Heart J 2014; 281:2873-2926.
- von Allmen RS, Anjum A, Powel JT. Outcomes after endovascular or open repair for degenerative thoracic aortic aneurysm using linked hospital data. Br J Surg 2014; 101(10):1244-51.
- Powell JT, Hinchliffe RJ, Sweeting MJ, Ashleigh R, Bell R, et al. Endovascular or open repair strategy for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: 30-day outcome from IMPROVE randomized trial. Brit Med J 2014; 348:f7661.
- Roelli EE, Idrees J, Greenberg RK, Johnston DR, et el. Endovascular grafting for ascending aortic repair in high risk patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 149(1):144-51.
- Taylor PR, Reidy J, Scoble JE. Enodvascular abdominal aneurysm repair and renal function. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006; 21(9):2362-65.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
International License, which permits use, share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format,
adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material, as long as you give appropriate credit,
provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner,
but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for
commercial purposes. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your
contributions under the same license as the original. You may not apply legal terms or technological
measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. The images or other
third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated
otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons
license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use,
you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license,
visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.