Vol. 46 | No. 2 | July-December 2018 Back

Open Access

Accuracy of the Six-Minute Walk Test and Duke Activity Status Index in Determining Improvement of Functional Capacity Among Adult Patients Enrolled in Cardiac Rehabilitation

Rochelle Regina Cruz, Irma Yape
Dec 2018 DOI 10.69944/pjc.6815e49657

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The six-minute walk test (6MWT) is a common outcome measurement in cardiac rehabilitation  but there are no established guidelines on its use in cardiac rehabilitation. Furthermore, the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) is a brief self-administered questionnaire that assesses the patient’s ability to perform common activities but its usefulness in cardiac rehabilitation has not yet been determined. This study aimed to assess the reliability of the 6MWT and DASI in determining improvement in functional capacity based on treadmill exercise test (TET) among patients enrolled in Phase I, II and III cardiac rehabilitation in Cardinal Santos Medical Center (CSMC) from September 2015-September 2016. 

METHODS: This was a prospective analytical study of all patients enrolled in cardiac rehabilitation in CSMC  from September 2015 to September 2016. All included patients completed the DASI questionnaire before cardiac rehabilitation and after completion of every Phase. The 6MWT and TET were done after Phase I, II and III of cardiac rehabilitation. The results were correlated with functional capacity using correlation analyses. 

RESULTS: Among the 85 patients initially included in this study, there were 81, 34 and five patients who  finished Phase I, II and III of cardiac rehabilitation, respectively. Progressive improvement of METs was observed with the progression of cardiac rehabilitation. Pearson correlation analysis revealed that peak VO2 based on DASI was moderately correlated with TET at Phase I and II (r=0.623 and 0.594, respectively) while the correlation was not statistically significant at Phase III. The peak VO2 based on 6MWT was also moderately correlated with TET but weaker correlation compared with DASI (r=0.481 and 0.471 for Phase I and Phase II, respectively). The correlation was not statistically significant at Phase III. The Lin concordance correlation coefficients for DASI were moderate for Phase I and II (ρ=0.5985 and 0.5087, respectively) and poor in Phase III (ρ=0.1051). On the other hand, 6MWT had fair agreement with TET in Phase I and Phase II (ρ=0.2432 and 0.3348, respectively). The correlation was not statistically significant at Phase III. Proportional bias was noted with the use of the 6MWT but not with DASI. 

Conclusion: Stronger correlation was seen with DASI questionnaire than 6MWT in determining functional  capacity among patients enrolled in Phase I and II cardiac rehabilitation compared to TET.

References
  1. American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Guidelines for Cardiac Rehabilitation and Secondary Prevention Programs. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics 2004.
  2. Enright PL, McBurnie MA, Bittner V, et al. The 6MWT: a quick measure of functional status in elderly adults. Chest. 2003; 123:
  3. Bader J, Madhavan DR. Using the Duke Activity Status Index in Heart Failure. American Heart Journal 2001;142:1041–1046.
  4. Leung YW, Grewal K, Gravely-Witte S, Suskin N, Stewart DE, Grace SL. Quality of life following participation in cardiac rehabilitation programs of longer or shorter than 6 months: does duration matter? Popul Health Manag. 2011 Aug;14(4):181-8.
  5. Merz CN, Olson M, McGorray S, Pakstis DL, Zell K, Rickens cardiac rehabilitation, Kelsey SF, Bittner V, Sharaf BL, Sopko G. Physical activity and functional capacity measurement in women: a report from the NHLBI-sponsored WISE study. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 2000. 9(7):769–777.
  6. Alonso J, Permanyer-Miralda G, Cascant P, Brotons C, Prieto L, Soler-Soler J. Measuring functional status of chronic coronary patients. Reliability, validity and responsiveness to clinical change of the reduced version of the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI). Eur Heart J. 1997 Mar;18(3):414-9.
  7. Bittner V. 6MWT in patients with cardiac dysfunction. Cardiologia 1997; 42: 897-902.
  8. Shoemaker MJ, Curtis AB, Vangsnes E, Dickinson MG. Triangulating clinically meaningful change in the 6MWT n individuals with chronic heart failure: a systematic review. Cardiopulm Phys Ther J. 2012; 23: 5-15.
  9. Wright DJ, Khan KM, Gossage EM, Saltissi S. Assessment of a low intensity cardiac rehabilitation programme using the 6MWT. Clin Rehabil. 2001;15:119-124.
License

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, which permits use, share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material, as long as you give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.