Vol. 49 | No. 1 | January-June 2021 Back

Open Access

Epidemiologic Burden of Hospitalization for Cardiac Arrhythmias Requiring Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Among Adult Filipinos

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is the therapy of choice in the prevention of  SCD. The ICD has been proven to improve survival among survivors of cardiac arrest, patients who are at risk of having one because of myocardial scarring and low left ventricular ejection fraction, and those with primary inherited arrhythmia syndromes. The insertion of an ICD is indicated for survivors of cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation or hemodynamically unstable sustained ventricular tachycardia after the exclusion of any reversible cause. At present, there are no nationwide data regarding the prevalence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias requiring an ICD. 

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the (1) total hospitalization claims per year (2017 and 2018) for arrhythmias requiring an ICD, (2) total number of cardioverter-defibrillator insertions done for patients mentioned in (1), (3) prevalence of hospitalization for cardiac arrhythmias requiring insertion of ICD among patients admitted for medical conditions for 2017 and 2018, (4) the demographic profile of patients who were hospitalized for cardiac arrhythmias requiring insertion of ICD, (5) type of facilities (primary, secondary, or tertiary; government or private) where the patients were confined, and (6) duration of hospitalization and mortality rate of patients admitted for the above conditions. 

METHODS: This is a descriptive study using the database of Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PhilHealth) on hospital claims of admitted patients 19 years or older in PhilHealth-accredited hospitals from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2018. Anonymized records were reviewed using the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) of the World Health Organization. The codes relevant to the study question were chosen and used. The PhilHealth Relative Value Scale (RVS) codes were used to determine the procedures that the patients underwent for their cardiac arrhythmias. Patients’ demographic profile, diagnosis, region, hospitalization stay and status on discharge, and type of facility of admission were collected. Descriptive statistics using median value and interquartile range for quantitative data and frequency and percentage for categorical data were reported.  

RESULTS: In 2017 and 2018, among patients 19 years or older, there were 1282 and 1480 claims of  cases of cardiac arrhythmias requiring an ICD (based on ICD-10 codes), whereas those who underwent  placement of an ICD (based on RVS codes) numbered 50 and 45, respectively. The prevalence of  hospitalization for cardiac arrhythmias related to ICD among patients who were admitted for medical  conditions was 0.05% and 0.06%, for the same years. The overall in-hospital mortality rates were 10.84%  and 9.46% in each year for those who were admitted for cardiac arrhythmias that required an ICD;  however, there were no recorded mortalities for those who underwent implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator. For patients with arrhythmias requiring an ICD (based on ICD-10 and RVS codes), the median  (first quartile [Q1], third quartile [Q3]) age was 59 (43, 72) years. In 2018, the median (Q1, Q3) age was  57 (38, 71) years. There were similar proportions of males (53%) and females (47%) in both years. The  majority of cases based on ICD-10 codes of cardiac arrhythmias requiring an ICD were confined in  government hospitals, whereas most of the claims for procedures based on RVS codes were in private  hospitals. Most of the procedures were done in the National Capital Region. The duration of hospitalization  was 3 to 4 days. 

CONCLUSION: Based on PhilHealth claims, the admission due to cardiac arrhythmias requiring ICD is  common in both private and government hospitals. Cardioverter-defibrillator implantation is being done  mostly in the National Capital Region and private hospitals. There is a wide gap between the prevalence of  cardiac arrhythmias requiring an ICD and the frequency of implantation of the lifesaving device. 

KEYWORDS: implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, sudden cardiac death, Brugada syndrome, PhilHealth

  1. Deo R, Albert CM. Epidemiology and genetics of sudden cardiac death. Circulation 2012;125(4):620–637. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.023838.
  2. Lim Z, Gibbs K, Potts JE, Sanatani S. A review of sudden unexpected death in the young in British Columbia. Can J Cardiol 2010;26(1):22–26.
  3. Gervacio-Domingo G, Punzalan FE, Amarillo ML, Dans A. Sudden unexplained death during sleep occurred commonly in the general population in the Philippines: a substudy of the National Nutrition and Health Survey. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:567–571.
  4. Gervacio-Domingo G, Isidro J, Tirona J, et al. The Brugada Type 1 electrocardiographic pattern is common among Filipinos. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:1067–1072.
  5. Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, et al. ACC/AHA/ HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation 2008;117:e350-e408. doi:10.1161/CIRCUALTIONAHA.108.189742.
  6. Myerburg RJ. Sudden cardiac death; exploring the limits of our knowledge. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2001:12:369.
  7. Guazon MPH. Algunas notas sobre bangungut. Rev Fil Med Farm 1917;8:437–442.
  8. Kaluag-Liboro F, Liboro A, Liboro OL. A new approach to the etiology of bangungot or sleeping death. J Philipp Med Assoc 1956;32(11):648–652.
  9. Munger RG, Booton EA. Bangungut in Manila: sudden and unexplained death in sleep of adult Filipinos. Int J Epidemiol 1998:27:6.
  10. Brugada P, Brugada J. Right bundle branch block, persistent ST segment elevation and sudden cardiac death: a distinct clinical and electrocardiographic syndrome; a multicenter report. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20;1391–1396.
  11. PhilHealth. List of Medical Case Rates. Updated February 2017. https://www.philhealth.gov.ph/circulars/2013/ annexes/circ35_2013/Annex1_ListOfMedicalCaseRates. pdf. Accessed September 21, 2017.
  12. 2016 PhilHealth Relative Value Scale codes/procedures. https://www.philhealth.gov.ph/circulars/2013/annexes/ circ35_2013/Annex2_ListOfProcedureCaseRates.pdf. Accessed December 19, 2017.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, which permits use, share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material, as long as you give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.