
Epidemiologic Burden of Hospitalization Among Adult Filipinos for Cardiac Arrhythmias Requiring Permanent Pacemaker Implantation
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Symptomatic bradycardia, commonly attributed to sinus node dysfunction/ sick sinus syndrome, or atrioventricular (AV) blocks or conduction disorders from chronic fascicular blocks, is treated by implantation of a permanent pacemaker. Despite it being a class 1 recommendation, there is a perception based on informal surveys that permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) is underutilized. The Philippines showed slow growth in the volume of implantation from 1049 in 2015 to 1225 in 2016. The Philippine pacemaker data after 2016 are incomplete and unreliable because of the lack of a national registry. It is the aim of this study to ascertain the prevalence of cardiac arrhythmias requiring PPI and the volume of its utilization in the Philippines.
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to (1) to determine the prevalence of hospitalization claims in 2017 and 2018 for cardiac arrhythmias requiring PPI, (2) to determine the regional distribution of arrhythmias requiring PPI, (3) to determine the regional distribution of hospitalization claims for PPI, (4) to determine the number of hospitalization claims for specific cases requiring PPI and the corresponding mortality rate, (5) to determine the number of hospitalization claims for PPI and the corresponding mortality rate, and (6) to describe the demographic profile of patients with indications and with claims for PPI, as well as the duration of hospitalization and type of facilities where the hospital claims were filed.
METHODS: This is a descriptive study of Filipino patients 19 years or older, admitted for cardiac arrhythmias requiring PPI in the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PhilHealth)–accredited hospitals in 2017 and 2018. The data for disease prevalence were gathered from the database of PhilHealth using the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) of the World Health Organization. The procedures that the patients underwent were determined using the latest PhilHealth Relative Value Scale (RVS) codes. Other variables gathered were the demographic data, diagnosis, region, duration of hospital stay, type of facility on admission, and the status on discharge. Qualitative data were tabulated and presented as frequency and percent distribution. Quantitative data were reported as median with corresponding quartiles (Q1 and Q3).
RESULTS: Based on the 2017 and 2018 database of PhilHealth, out of the nationwide total medical admissions, there were 958 total claims for arrhythmias requiring pacemaker implantation in 2017 and 1144 total claims in 2018. The prevalence in both years was similar (0.04%). There were 549 and 683 total claims for PPI, in 2017 and 2018, respectively, and preponderantly done in the National Capital Region. Sick sinus syndrome/tachycardia–bradycardia syndrome had the greatest number of total claims for both years. More than half of the patients who had PPI were females. The median age was similar (67 and 68 years old for both years and 73 and 75 years old in 2017 and 2018, based on ICD-10 and RVS codes, respectively). The duration of hospitalization was a median of 4 days (ICD-10 codes) and 5 to 6 days (RVS codes). Most of the hospital claims for cardiac arrhythmias (76%–79%) requiring PPI were filed in private facilities. Mortality among those diagnosed was 3.6% for complete atrioventricular block and 0.3% for sick sinus syndrome but was low among those who underwent PPI (0.8%–2.2%)..
CONCLUSION: The prevalence of hospitalization claims for arrhythmias requiring PPI was 0.04%, both in 2017 and 2018. There is a big gap between the number of cases requiring a permanent pacemaker and the number that underwent the procedure. Hospitalization claims, based on ICD-10 codes and RVS codes, were centralized in the National Capital Region and private hospitals. The mortality rate among those who had the procedure was low.
KEYWORDS: arrhythmia, permanent pacemaker insertion or implantation, prevalence, hospitalization, PhilHealth
- Department of Health. Mortality: Ten (10) leading causes. http://www.doh.gov.ph/mortality.
- Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Barrett C, et al. 2018 ACC/ AHA/HRS guideline on the evaluation and management of patients with bradycardia and cardiac conduction delay. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;74:e51–e156. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jacc. 2018.10.044
- Mond HG, Irwin M, Ector H, Proclemer A. The world survey of cardiac pacing and cardioverter-defibrillators: calendar year 2005 an International Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology Society (ICPES) project. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2008;31(9):1202–1212. doi:10. 1111/j.1540- 8159.2008.01164.x.
- Silverman B, Gross T, Kaczmarek RG, Hamilton P, Hamburger S. The epidemiology of pacemaker implantation in the United States. Public Health Rep 1995;110(1):42–46.
- APHRS White Book 2019. https://www.aphrs.org. 6. Panicker, GK, Desai B, Lokhandwala Y. Choosing pacemakers appropriately. Heart Asia 2009:26–30. doi:10.1136/ha2008.000265
- Philippine Health Insurance Corporation 2017 Annual Report. https://www.philhealth.gov.ph/about_us/annual_ report/ar2017.pdf. Accessed August 11, 2020.
- Philippine Health Insurance Corporation 2018 Annual Report. https://www.philhealth.gov.ph/about_us/annual_ report/ar2018.pdf Accessed August 11, 2020.
- Z Package Cares for the Heart. https://www.philhealth.gov. ph/news/2015/zpackage_cvares.html.
- PhilHealth. List of Medical Case Rates. Updated February 2017. https://www.philhealth.gov.ph/circulars/2013/ annexes/circ35_2013/Annex1_ListOfMedicalCaseRates. pdf. Accessed September 21, 2017.
- 2016 PhilHealth Relative Value Scale codes/procedures. https://www.philhealth.gov.ph/circulars/2013/annexes/ circ35_2013/Annex2_ListOfProcedureCaseRates.pdf. Accessed December 19, 2017.
- Bradshaw PJ, Stobie P, Knuiman MW, Briffa TG, Hobbs MST. Trends in the incidence and prevalence of cardiac pacemaker insertions in an aging population. Open Heart 2014;1:e000177. doi:10.1136/openhrt-2014-000177.
- List of Procedure Case Rates (Revision 1.0). https://www.Philhealth.gov.ph.
- Pestaño NS, Tumanan-Mendoza BA, Mendoza VL, et al. Availability of healthcare provider and healthcare facility for adult Filipino patients hospitalized for congestive heart failure. Philipp J Cardiol 2018;46:51–57.
- Speedie A, Mathew C, Shahi RS, Calton R. Long-term mortality in patients with permanent implantation. J Assoc Phys India 2016;64(9):18–22.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
International License, which permits use, share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format,
adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material, as long as you give appropriate credit,
provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner,
but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for
commercial purposes. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your
contributions under the same license as the original. You may not apply legal terms or technological
measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. The images or other
third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated
otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons
license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use,
you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license,
visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.