Vol. 51 | No. 1 | January-June 2023Back

Open Access

Comparison of Radial Artery Occlusion Occurrence Between Compression Band Device and Manually Applied Gauze Compression After Transradial Coronary Procedure

Hazelene Joyce G. Ramos, Jhoanna G. Marcelo, Ronaldo H. Estacio, Maribel G. Tanque
Jun 2023 DOI 10.69944/pjc.11f282fb8c

More Info

Hazelene Joyce G. Ramos, MD | Jhoanna G. Marcelo, MD | Ronaldo H. Estacio, MD | Maribel G. Tanque, MD

Philippine Heart Center, Quezon City, Philippines

References
  1. Campeau L. Percutaneous radial artery approach for  coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 1989;16:3–7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1810160103. 
  2. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, de Melker E. Transradial artery  coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J 1995;129:1–7. doi:  10.1016/0002-8703(95)90034-9. 
  3. Mitchell MD, Hong JA, Lee BY, Umscheid CA, Bartsch  SM, Don CW. Systematic review and cost-benefit analysis  of radial artery access for coronary angiography and  intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2012; 5:  454–462.  
  4. Anderson SG, Ratib K, Myint PK, et al. Impact of age on  access site-related outcomes in 469,983 percutaneous  coronary intervention procedures: insights from the British  Cardiovascular Intervention Society. Catheter Cardiovasc  Interv 2015;86:965–972. 
  5. Ratib K, Mamas MA, Anderson SG, et al. Access site  practice and procedural outcomes in relation to clinical  presentation in 439,947 patients undergoing percutaneous  coronary intervention in the United Kingdom. JACC  Cardiovasc Interv 2015;8:20–29. 
  6. Mamas MA, Anderson SG, Carr M, et al. Baseline  bleeding risk and arterial access site practice in relation  to procedural outcomes following percutaneous coronary  intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:1554–1564. 
  7. Ratib K, Mamas MA, Routledge HC, Ludman PF, Fraser  DG, Nolan J. Influence of access site choice on incidence  of neurologic complications after percutaneous coronary  intervention. Am Heart J 2013;165:317–324. 
  8. Bertrand OF, Rao SV, Pancholy S, et al. Transradial  approach for coronary angiography and interventions:  results of the first international transradial practice survey.  JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3:1022–1031. 
  9. Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, Yusuf S, Mehta SR.  Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography  or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and  ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of  randomized trials. Am Heart J 2009;157:132–140. 
  10. Brueck M, Bandorski D, Kramer W, Wieczorek M, Höltgen  R, Tillmanns H. A randomized comparison of transradial  versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography  and angioplasty. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009;2:1047– 1054.  
  11. Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, et al; RIVAL Trial Group. Radial  versus femoral access for coronary angiography and  intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes  (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial.  Lancet 2011;307:1409–1420. 
  12. Romagnoli E, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A, et al. Radial  versus femoral randomizedinvestigation in ST-segment  elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS  (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study. J Am Coll  Cardiol 2012;60(24):2481–2489. 
  13. Cooper CJ, El-Shiekh RA, Cohen DJ, et al. Effect of  transradial access on quality of life and cost of cardiac  catheterization: a randomized comparison. Am Heart J 1999;138(3 pt 1):430–436. 
  14. Mamas MA, Fraser DG, Ratib K, et al. Minimising radial  injury: prevention is better than cure. EuroIntervention 2014;10:824–832. 
  15. Abdelaal E, Brousseau-Provencher C, Montminy S,  et al. Risk score, causes, and clinical impact of failure  of transradial approach for percutaneous coronary  interventions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013;6:1129–1137. 
  16. Kotowycz MA, Džavík V. Radial artery patency  after transradial catheterization. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2012;5:127–133. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.965871. 
  17. Stella PR, Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, et al. Incidence and  outcome of radial artery occlusion following transradial  artery coronary angioplasty. Catheter Cardiovasc  Diagn 1997;40:156–158. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097  0304(199702)40:2<156::AID-CCD7>3.0.CO;2-A. 
  18. Zhou YJ, Zhao YX, Cao Z, et al. Incidence and risk factors  of acute radial artery occlusion following transradial  percutaneous coronary intervention. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za  Zhi 2007;87:1531–1534. 
  19. Nagai S, Abe S, Sato T, et al. Ultrasonic assessment  of vascular complications in coronary angiography and  angioplasty after transradial approach. Am J Cardiol 1999;83:180–186. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(98)00821-2. 
  20. De Rosa S, Passafaro F, Polimeni A, et al. A novel quick  and easy test for radial artery occlusion with the laser  Doppler scan. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:e89–e90.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.11.028. 
  21. Saito S, Ikei H, Hosokawa G, et al. Influence of the ratio  between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer  diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary  intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 1999;46:173–178.  doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(199902)46:2<173::AID CCD12>3.0.CO;2-4. 
  22. Rashid M, Kwok C, Pancholy S, et al. Radial artery  occlusion after transradial interventions: a systematic review  and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2016;5(1):e002686.  doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002686. 
  23. Petroglou D, Didagelos, M, Chalikias G. Manual versus  mechanical compression of radial artery after transradial  coronary angiography: the MEMORY multicenter  randomized trial. Cardiovascular Interv 2018;11(11):1050– 1058. 
  24. Bertrand OF, Rao SV, Pancholy S, et al. Transradial  approach for coronary angiography and interventions:  results of the first international transradial practice survey.  JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3:1022–1031. 
  25. Avdikos G, Karatasakis A, Tsoumeleas A, et al. Radial  artery occlusion after transradial coronary catheterization.  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2017;7(3):305–316. 
  26. Cubero JM, Lombardo J, Pedrosa C, et al. Radial  compression guided by mean artery pressure versus  standard compression with a pneumatic device  (RACOMAP). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009;73:467–472.
  27. Edris A, Gordin J, Sallam T, Meymandi S, Traina M. Patent  hemostasis rapid deflation technique to reduce radial artery  occlusion. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:B241.  
  28. Chou MT, Chiang CY. Effect of short-time compression with  Kaolin-filled pad on radial artery occlusion after transradial  access catheterization. Glob Heart 2014;9:e207.  
  29. Dangoisse V, Guedes A, Chenu P, et al. Pulse oximetry  versus Doppler for patency evaluation at 24 h and 1 month  after transradial approach. Results of the randomized  CRASOC (Compression of Radial Arteries Without  Occlusion) study. J Invasive Cardiol 2012;24/9:1042–3931.  
  30. Pancholy S, Coppola J, Patel T, Roke-Thomas M.  Prevention of Radial Artery Occlusion–Patent Hemostasis  Evaluation Trial (PROPHET study): a randomized  comparison of traditional versus patency documented  hemostasis after transradial catheterization. Catheter  Cardiovasc Interv 2008;72:335–340. 
  31. Fernandez RS, Lee A. Effects of methods used to  achieve hemostasis on radial artery occlusion following  percutaneous coronary procedures: a systematic review.  JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 2017;15:738– 764. 
  32. Chatelain P, Arceo A,Rombaut E, Verin V, Urban P. New  device for compression of the radial artery after diagnostic  and interventional cardiac procedures. Catheter Cardiovasc  Diagn 1997;40:297–300. 
  33. Yun K, Jeon W, Kang B, Kim G. Effectiveness of a  compressive device in controlling hemorrhage following  radial artery catheterization. Clin Exp Emerg Med 2015;2:104–109.
License

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, which permits use, share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material, as long as you give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.