Vol. 51 | No. 1 | January-June 2023 Back

Open Access

A Comparison of the 6-Minute Walk Test to Treadmill Exercise Test as a Tool to Evaluate Functional Capacity in Healthy ManilaMed Employees: The CoST TET Study

Nicy F. Narvas, Mariel Barcelon-Cruz, Felix Eduardo Puzalan
Jun 2023 DOI 10.69944/pjc.17830e3156

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Functional capacity is a strong predictor of mortality and nonfatal cardiovascular outcomes in both men and women with and without coronary artery disease. This study aimed to compare the distance traveled of the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) to the metabolic equivalent (MET) of the treadmill exercise test (TET) as a measure of functional capacity among healthy ManilaMed (Medical Center Manila) employees and to determine and compare the distance traveled in 6MWT and the MET of TET according to general characteristics such as age, sex, height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) as determinants of maximal walking distance and the cause of the early termination of the TET.

METHODS: This was a single-center prospective cross-sectional study done at a private tertiary hospital. All participants underwent TET and 6MWT. Metabolic equivalent of TET, distance traveled in 6MWT, and the computed MET of the distance traveled were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS: Fifty healthy employees performed both the 6MWT and the TET to measure their functional capacity. Twenty-two were males, and 28 were females. The mean age was 31.80 ± 7.17 years, and the mean ± SD for BMI was 25.05 ± 4.32 kg/m2. Using 400 m as predictor of good functional capacity, the farther the distance traveled (>400 m), the higher the MET they achieved in the TET, and the lower the distance traveled (<400 m), the lower the MET achieved in the TET (t test P = 0.0125). This study also showed that more than or equal to 400- m distance traveled in the 6MWT can be used as a measure of good functional capacity in this population. However, there was a significant difference (t test P = 0.006) in the computed MET in the 6MWT in relation to the MET achieved in TET. In this study age, sex, and BMI were the predictors of the distance traveled in the 6MWT (P = 0.0049) and in the TET.

CONCLUSION: The distance traveled in meters in the 6MWT can be used as an objective measure of functional capacity in healthy population, and >400-m distance can be used as a parameter of good functional capacity. The formula used to compute MET in the 6MWT is not comparable with the MET achieved in TET. Age, sex, and BMI significantly influenced the performance in the 6MWT and TET.

References
  1. ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical  Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS statement  guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit  Care Med 2002;166(1):111–117. 
  2. Donini LM, Poggiogalle E, Mosca V, Pinto A, Brunani  A, Capodaglio P. Disability affects the 6-minute walking  distance in obese subjects (BMI>40 kg/m(2)). PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e75491. 
  3. Milanović Z, Pantelić S, Trajković N, Sporiš G, Kostić R,  James N. Age-related decrease in physical activity and  functional fitness among elderly men and women. Clin  Interv Aging 2013;8:549–556. 
  4. Solway S, Brooks D, Lacasse Y, Thomas S. A qualitative  systematic overview of the measurement properties of  functional walk test used in the cardiorespiratory domain.  Chest 2001;119:256–270. 
  5. Bittner V, Singh S. The 6 minute walk test. Cardiology  Advisor. 2017. 
  6. Chetta A, Zanini A, Pisi G, et al. Reference values for the  6-min walk test in healthy subjects 20–50 years old. Respir  Med 2006;100:1573–1578. 
  7. Troosters T, Gosselink R, Decramer M. Six minute  walking distance in healthy elderly subjects. Eur Respir J 1999;14:270–274. 
  8. Chetta A, Zaninib A, Pisi G, et al. Reference values for the  6-min walk test in healthy subjects 20–50 years old. Respir  Med 2006;100:1573–1578. 
  9. Venkatesh N, Thanikachalam S, Satyanarayana Murthy J,  Maiya A, Senthil Kumar T, Sridevi S. Six minute walk test: a  literary review. Sri Ramachandra J Med 2011;4(1):30–34. 
  10. Cooper KH. A means of assessing maximal oxygen intake:  correlation between field and treadmill testing. JAMA 1968;203:201–204. 
  11. Balke B. A simple field test for the assessment of physical  fitness. Rep Civ Aeromed Res Inst US 1963:1–8. 
  12. Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Beasley JW, et al. ACC/AHA  Guidelines for Exercise Testing. A report of the American  College of Cardiology/American Heart Association. Task  Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Exercise  Testing. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30(1):260–311.
License

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, which permits use, share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material, as long as you give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.